home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.legal
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!mnemonic
- From: mnemonic@eff.org (Mike Godwin)
- Subject: Re: Supreme Court and Homosexuality
- Message-ID: <1992Nov22.230615.13593@eff.org>
- Originator: mnemonic@eff.org
- Sender: usenet@eff.org (NNTP News Poster)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eff.org
- Organization: Electronic Frontier Foundation
- References: <24067@galaxy.ucr.edu>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 23:06:15 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <24067@galaxy.ucr.edu> judson@watserv.ucr.edu writes:
-
- >You obviously did not read my post clearly enough. I said that I was in
- >agreement with the Supreme Court in the case in question because the Appellee
- >argued that homosexuality was a fundamental right which could not be abridged.
-
- Please cite your source for your claim that *anyone* in Bowers v. Hardwick
- argued that "homosexuality was a fundamental right which could not be
- abridged."
-
- I don't find anything like this argument in the brief.
-
-
- --Mike
-
-
-
- --
- Mike Godwin, |"I can solve this Orient Express thing without
- mnemonic@eff.org| breaking a sweat. It's that simple."
- (617) 864-0665 |
- EFF, Cambridge | --Hercule Perot
-