home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!optilink!cramer
- From: cramer@optilink.COM (Clayton Cramer)
- Newsgroups: misc.legal
- Subject: Re: Supreme Court and Homosexuality
- Message-ID: <13311@optilink.COM>
- Date: 20 Nov 92 16:54:42 GMT
- References: <1992Nov15.020915.13341@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Nov19.161549.10095@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>
- Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <1992Nov19.161549.10095@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>, gsmith@clio.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de (Gene W. Smith) writes:
- > In article <13239@optilink.UUCP> cramer@optilink.UUCP (Clayton Cramer)
- > writes:
- > >Why do I suspect that the Supreme Court just wanted to teach this
- > >guy a lesson about "wasting" their time?
- >
- > Becuase you are a phony libertarian? If that is what they thought,
- > why did they accept the case in the first place?
- >
- > Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/IWR/Ruprecht-Karls University
-
- To make an example of what happens when you waste the time of
- the courts?
-
- I think their decision was wrong. What two consenting adults
- do in private is none of the government's business. Mr. Smith
- apparently considers me a "phony" libertarian because I believe
- consistently that private actions between consenting adults
- are none of the government's business. Mr. Smith, being a
- homosexual, has powerful reasons to oppose such an idea, because
- it would take away the homosexual fascist lobby's primary method
- of shutting people up: antidiscrimination laws for homosexuals.
-
-
-
- --
- Clayton E. Cramer {uunet,pyramid}!optilink!cramer My opinions, all mine!
- We could say that Congress spends money like drunken sailors. But that would
- be unfair -- to the sailors. They, at least, are spending their own money.
-