home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky misc.invest:14132 alt.politics.clinton:17713 alt.politics.bush:14026
- Newsgroups: misc.invest,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!cs.uiuc.edu!watanabe
- From: watanabe@cs.uiuc.edu (Larry Watanabe)
- Subject: Re: Opinions on Reich?
- Message-ID: <By7AID.B4C@cs.uiuc.edu>
- Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL
- References: <1992Nov24.000115.83838@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 03:18:12 GMT
- Lines: 64
-
- taw4@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (TODD A WATKINS) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Nov21.015954.1536@cs.sfu.ca>, mcdonald@cs.sfu.ca (Ken Mcdonald)
- >writes:
- >>
- >>Can anyone in netland offer a thumbnail (or better) synopsis of Reich,
- >>Clinton's Man From Harvard, and the ideas this fellow is pushing? I
- >>like Clinton, but looking at Reich makes me very uneasy. (Visual looking--
- >>on nothing but first impressions, I neither like nor trust the man. This
- >>isn't a very good way of evaluating people, but at the moment, it's all
- >>I've got.) Feedback from people who know and understand Reich's work in
- >>some detail is especially desired. I'll track down and read his books
- >>sometime, but probably not soon. Is his research sound? Does he use
- >>reasonable assumptions? (Many economists do not.) Can he justify his
- >>conclusions by historical validation? (Well, maybe "justify" isn't
- >>the right word here. You know what I mean.) Etc. etc.
- >>
-
- >I've just spent the last 8 years at the Kennedy School at Harvard, where Reich
- >teaches. I recently left, but I had the opportunity to get to know him and his >work.
-
- >I would not call his work true scholarly "research" but rather "synthesis" and
- >"popularization," which he does extraordinarily well.
- >This lack of contributions to academic research is
- >reflected in the fact that he is not a tenured professor at the Kennedy
- >School, but rather gets continuing appointments as a Lecturer.
-
- >I would describe his work as Liberal, but pragmatically so. I'd also not call
- >him an economist. His background is in law.
-
- >Anyway, the Clinton economic plan to date is vintage Reich
- >-- investment in infrastructure and
- >human assets, education and training. These are assets, in Reich's view
- >that government can invest in for long term growth without the fear that the
- >assets will pick up and move offshore. Roads, bridges, pipelines, and people
- >do not tend to be very mobile -- whereas other forms of investment, even
- >capital equipment, can pick up and move, and increasingly do, in Reich's view,
- >in the global economy. He's recently made famous the phrase "Who is Us?"
- >to indicate the difficulty we would have identifying a truly "U.S." company,
- >when stockholders are globally distributed,
- >multinational companies employ people worldwide,
- >cars are made with parts from all over the globe. The only assets the
- >government and taxpayers can be assured will be truly American are its people
- >and infrastructure. For an American it matters little, for Reich, if he is
- >employed by Honda or IBM, because both firms will only invest in the US
- >if there are well trained employees to run the machines, and manage the
- >plants, and investment by one is as good as investment by the other.
-
- >I'm grossly simplifying here, but that's the nutshell.
-
- >As for his personality and trustworthiness,
- >he's a delightful and honest man, as far as I can
- >tell, and is probably the single most popular teacher at the Kennedy School.
- >--
- >Todd A. Watkins Lehigh University/College of Business & Economics
- >taw4@lehigh.edu Rauch Business Center #37/Bethlehem, PA 18015
-
- Glad to hear he's honest and popular. Honesty is of course
- important, but popularity may also help collaborative decision making.
-
- These ideas seem to make sense to me .. but I do think that
- having strong American-based companies is also important.
-
- -Larry Watanabe watanabe@cs.uiuc.edu
-