home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!nntp1.radiomail.net!fernwood!autodesk!mickw
- From: mickw@autodesk.com (Mick Washbrook)
- Newsgroups: misc.fitness
- Subject: Re: Muscle And Fitness
- Message-ID: <17937@autodesk.COM>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 22:21:25 GMT
- References: <1992Oct25.181352.186@wam.umd.edu> <If15Kp600iUx07=cAY@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Sender: news@Autodesk.COM
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <If15Kp600iUx07=cAY@andrew.cmu.edu>, rr2y+@andrew.cmu.edu (Ryan E. Rasmussen) writes:
-
- > Ironman, however, is an excellent magazine. The training articles
- > are realistic and for the most part cater to the "hardgainer," which
- > most of us are without drugs.
-
- Yeah, "Ironman" used to be a good magazine, until they tried as hard as possible
- to emulate Weider. They lost me when they started on their antisteroid rampage and
- still continued publishing pictures of guys who used them, which I really find
- hypocritical. I guess we're all supposed to think these guys are "natural" now,
- right?
-
- I'll stick with "MuscleMag" for now.
-
- --
- Death to all fanatics!!
-
- Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.
-
-