home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.unix.solaris:334 comp.unix.bsd:9087
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!terra.cs.waikato.ac.nz!terra.cs.waikato.ac.nz!not-for-mail
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.bsd
- Subject: Re: Solaris 1.1 vs. Solaris 2.0 (BSD vs AT&T)
- Message-ID: <1egsjtINNsk5@terra.cs.waikato.ac.nz>
- From: bcs@terra.cs.waikato.ac.nz (Brent Summers)
- Date: 20 Nov 1992 09:14:53 +1300
- References: <VIXIE.92Nov14194825@cognition.pa.dec.com> <327@wafbox.UUCP> <1992Nov19.164146.26801@osf.org>
- Distribution: world
- Organization: Comp Sci, U of Waikato, New Zealand
- NNTP-Posting-Host: terra.cs.waikato.ac.nz
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <1992Nov19.164146.26801@osf.org> loverso@coltsfoot.osf.org
- (John Robert LoVerso) writes:
- |AT&T != UNIX. BSD != UNIX. SYSV != UNIX. (OSF/1 != UNIX)
-
- Agreed!
- Does anyone have the correct text for Dennis Ritchie's comment re only
- using the word "UNIX" as an adjective?
-
- |UNIX == Tenth Edition.
-
- Hmmm, not even sure that is true in any practical sense.
-
- |And it is over. See Plan 9.
-
- Love to - got a copy of the sources?
-
- --
- +-Brent Summers, U of Waikato, NZ------------------------------------------+
- | Programming: Navigating through an infinity of programs in search of |
- | one of a much smaller infinity of reasonable solutions. Blindfolded. |
- +--------------------------------------------------------bcs@waikato.ac.nz-+
-