home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!apple!mumbo.apple.com!pcnntp.apple.com!gateway.qm.apple.com!Dale_Adams
- From: Dale_Adams@gateway.qm.apple.com (Dale Adams)
- Subject: Re: Apple Crippling Systems?!?
- Sender: news@pcnntp.apple.com
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.141809.17649@pcnntp.apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 14:18:09 GMT
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: Apple Computer Inc.
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <1992Nov23.051058.6554@mcs.drexel.edu> tjhendry@mcs.drexel.edu
- (Jonathan Hendry) writes:
- > The point is that, I believe, the floating point operations that WERE
- > implemented don't work. In other words, Motorola makes an 040. They test
- > it, and find that the floating-point operations are not "up to spec". So
- > they sell it as the 680LC40 (or something to that effect) as an 040
- > minus the floating point functions.
-
- Actually, this isn't what Motorola is doing at all. The 68LC040 (the
- processor with no floating point) is a different chip than the 68040 (the
- one with floating point hardware). To the best of my knowledge, Motorloa
- is not shipping 68040s which fail FPU tests as 68LC040s. The main reason
- the LC040 is cheaper than a 'full' 040 is that the die is smaller -
- they've removed the (not inconsiderable) chip area used for the floating
- point hardware, thus resulting in a smaller piece of silicon. The whole
- idea here is not to pay for floating point hardware if you really don't
- need it. (The performance of the vast majority of Mac applications really
- depends on integer, not floating point, performance. There are some
- exceptions to this, but in general it holds true.) Incidentally, the
- pinout for the two processors is identical, so you could theoretically
- design a machine using a 68LC040 which could be upgraded to a 68040 just
- by swapping processors.
-
- - Dale Adams
-