home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!news.funet.fi!ajk.tele.fi!funic!nntp.hut.fi!kaira.hut.fi!t35058d
- From: t35058d@kaira.hut.fi (Sami Markus Kuisma)
- Subject: Re: 25 mHz IIsi--FAILURE
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.123536.28293@nntp.hut.fi>
- Sender: usenet@nntp.hut.fi (Usenet pseudouser id)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: kaira.hut.fi
- Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
- References: <1992Oct30.034857.11286@leland.Stanford.EDU> <2210021@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 12:35:36 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <2210021@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM> bayes@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM (Scott Bayes) writes:
- >This upgrade is a "your mileage may vary" situation. You're taking
- >various components that the mfgrs said will run fine w/20MHz clocking
- >(40 MHz) and adding 25% to what they promised. You'd expect some
- >systems will be "lucky" and go, and others won't. The really unlucky
- >folks might find it goes _mostly_, but every so often, something on the
- >bus bobbles a cycle. That could get really nasty.
- >
- >You're gambling, people.
- >
- >ScottB
-
- It didn't work for me either. After ten minutes system crashed.
- But before crashing I got 24.5% increase in speed. I think this is
- heating problem but I haven't tried heat sinking yet.
-
- Could the processor heat up enough in just ten minutes (it didn't feel hot)?
-
- Sami Kuisma
-
-