home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!daver!hico2!sonyd1.Broadcast.Sony.COM!blilly.UUCP!bruce
- From: bruce@blilly.UUCP (Bruce Lilly)
- Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
- Subject: Re: Any easy way to filter this type of UUCP traffic?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.233325.14291@blilly.UUCP>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 23:33:25 GMT
- References: <HER8MAE@heaven7.in-berlin.de> <1992Nov14.001910.25570@blilly.UUCP> <4003@ecicrl.ocunix.on.ca>
- Reply-To: lilb@sony.compuserve.com
- Organization: Bruce Lilly
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <4003@ecicrl.ocunix.on.ca> clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis) wrote:
- >In article <1992Nov14.001910.25570@blilly.UUCP> lilb@sony.compuserve.com writes:
-
- [...]
- >>perception of why the maps exist; to provide an accurate model
- >>for UUCP network connectivity or to intentionally provide a
- >>distorted view of the UUCP network.
- >
- >Not all links are bidirectional
-
- For replies, bounce messages etc. to work properly *for mail
- delivery via UUCP/rmail*, bidirectional links are required.
- If the link isn't bidirectional, it is therefore unsuited for
- mail delivery via UUCP and should not be in the maps at all.
-
- >Except that now it'll take two people to delete it instead of one.
-
- Grasping at straws, Chris?
-
- --
- Bruce Lilly blilly!bruce@Broadcast.Sony.COM
- ...uunet!sonyusa!sonyd1!blilly!bruce
-