home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!lll-winken!telecom-request
- From: ssbc+@andrew.cmu.edu (Sam Swett)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
- Subject: Re: Two Cellular Phones on the Same Number
- Message-ID: <telecom12.849.2@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 01:44:31 GMT
- Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Organization: TELECOM Digest
- Lines: 10
- Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 849, Message 2 of 13
-
- > Wait a minute; this is a *clear* example of [I forget, there's a Latin
- > term for it], where somebody says something that *appears* to follow
- > from something else, but there's actually no relation between the two.
-
- I believe the phrase you're looking for is "non sequitor", meaning
- "does not follow"...
-
-
- sam (equipped with airbag)
-