home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!telecom-request
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 92 13:02:37 GMT
- From: vixen!jadams@uunet.UU.NET (22475-adams)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
- Subject: Re: HELP Needed on JPEG Standard!
- Message-ID: <telecom12.845.6@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
- Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 845, Message 6 of 7
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <telecom12.834.9@eecs.nwu.edu>, dave@westmark.com (Dave
- Levenson) writes:
-
- > In article <telecom12.821.6@eecs.nwu.edu>, johnl@iecc.cambridge.ma.us
- > (John R. Levine) writes:
-
- > compress video for transmission between sets.
- > As an aside ... why in the world did they use that <2500> model number? Is
- > it possible that someone at AT&T didn't know it had been used once
- > before, for a product that once had what might be called 'significant
- > market penetration'?
-
- Or could it be that some marketeers hope for a repeat performance with
- the new "2500"?
-
-
- Jack (John) Adams Bellcore NVC 2Z-220
- (908) 758-5372 {Voice} (908) 758-4389 {Facsimile}
- jadams@vixen.bellcore.com kahuna@attmail.com
-
-