home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!bcm!convex!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!news.yale.edu!mars.caps.maine.edu!maine.maine.edu!cunyvm!psuvm!auvm!NEPTUNE.KINGSTON.AC.UK!BS_S467
- Via: UK.AC.KING; 17 NOV 92 15:56:23 GMT
- X-Envelope-to: stat-l@mcgill1.bitnet
- X-VMS-To: IN%"stat-l@mcgill1.bitnet"
- X-VMS-Cc: BS_S467
- MIME-version: 1.0
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
- Message-ID: <01GR9I3ZC5SY000JOJ@neptune.kingston.ac.uk>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.stat-l
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 15:55:45 +0000
- Sender: "STATISTICAL CONSULTING" <STAT-L@MCGILL1.BITNET>
- From: Stephen Gourlay <BS_S467@NEPTUNE.KINGSTON.AC.UK>
- Subject: the meaning of transformations
- Lines: 20
-
- In the discussion of testing assumptions, someone mentioned transformations.
-
- I have always had a problem with these, namely, that whilst I know that my
- data represented e.g. counts of something, I cannot figure out a
- non-mathematical understanding of what transformed counts mean. As a result
- I am very reluctant to transform data just to 'make it fit'.
-
- Has anyone any references, discussion of this problem, explanation of what
- particular common transformations mean in 'ordinary' language?
-
- I will compile any suggestions, comments mailed to me and send the result to
- the list.
-
- Stephen Gourlay
- Senior Lecturer
- Kingston University
- Kingston on Thames
- UK
-
- bs_s467@neptune.kingston.ac.uk
-