home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!newsflash.concordia.ca!garrot.DMI.USherb.CA!uxa.ecn.bgu.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!NIH3PLUS.BITNET!MCCLELLAND_R
- Message-ID: <D921117.T082459.G1287.M01.C01@nih3plus>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.stat-l
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 08:24:59 EST
- Sender: "STATISTICAL CONSULTING" <STAT-L@MCGILL1.BITNET>
- From: McClelland_R%PSB%BLS@NIH3PLUS.BITNET
- Subject: Re: Rule of thumb
- Lines: 22
-
- |Date: 11-17-92 8:20am
- |From: McClelland_R:PSB:BLS
- | To: {STAT-L@MCGILL1}:BITNET:NIH
- |Subj: Re: Rule of thumb
- |In-Reply-To: Message from {STAT-L@MCGILL1}:BITNET of 11-16-92
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- >PS from/to Russ Lenth:
-
- >> PS - I'm told that the term "rule of thumb" has to do with the size
- of
- >> stick a husband may use to beat his wife (presumably in places like
- >> Iowa where the ERA was just defeated). I suggest we use more
- tasteful
- >> terminology.
- >>
- >Interesting point, which I would rather not have learned. Is a phrase
- >in poor taste if (almost) no one using it knows where it came from?
-
- Let's try to unwind a bit. It is just a saying.
-
- Rob McClelland
-