home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UICVM.BITNET!U32472
- Message-ID: <IBM-MAIN%92112201542068@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 01:48:42 CST
- Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion list <IBM-MAIN@RICEVM1.BITNET>
- Comments: "Alan Hinds"
- Comments: "Computer Center (M/C 135)"
- Comments: "1940 W. Taylor St., Room 124"
- Comments: "Chicago, IL 60612-7352"
- From: "Alan Hinds (312-996-4541)" <U32472@UICVM.BITNET>
- Subject: Re: IEFBR14
- In-Reply-To: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 14:27:26 EST,
- from Matt Simpson <SYSMATT@UKCC.UKY.EDU>
- Lines: 14
-
- > On Fri, 20 Nov 1992 12:56:00 CST Dave Ulrick said:
- >> ....
- >>
- >>I heard all of this second-hand, of course, so I will happily
- >>stand corrected. If I'm right, though, there have been a total
- >>of *two* bugs in IEFBR14.
- >>
- > Pretty disgusting, when you look at it as the number of defects per
- > line of code, which some people use as a quality measure.
-
- Perhaps this explains why I read in an MVS Conversion Notebook
- (for conversion from MVT to MVS) that IEFBR14 would not be
- supported in MVS! I swear it! I guess it was kept by popular
- demand.
-