home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!chx400!Sirius.dfn.de!news.belwue.de!math.fu-berlin.de!informatik.tu-muenchen.de!regent!monu1.cc.monash.edu.au!monu6!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!sol.deakin.OZ.AU!gjw
- From: gjw@cm.deakin.OZ.AU (Greg Wickham)
- Newsgroups: aus.comms
- Subject: Re: Billing Pulses, Tytel Phone
- Date: 19 Nov 1992 23:10:40 GMT
- Organization: Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Lines: 8
- Sender: gjw@deakin.edu.au (Greg Wickham)
- Distribution: aus
- Message-ID: <1eh6tgINNdt5@sol.deakin.OZ.AU>
- References: <Bxxpw5.EM3@syd.dms.CSIRO.AU> <1992Nov19.020801.19265@cs.uow.edu.au>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: aragorn.cm.deakin.oz.au
-
- david@cs.uow.edu.au (David E A Wilson) writes:
- >Similarly, a call from (02) 456 xxxx [Berowra] to (02) 520 xxxx [Engadine] is
- >charged at the Community call rate as the two zones are not adjacent.
-
- When dialing a number that requires an STD code but is in an _adjacent_
- zone, is it charged at the community call rate?
-
- -Greg
-