>|> I'm pretty excited about this film but I just saw the book for the movie.
>|> The begining of the book (all I allowed myself to read) is not Bram Stockers.
>|> In fact the book of the movie is nothing like Stockers at all when it comes
>|> to the style of writing. Stocker wrote Dracula as a series of journels
>|> while this book is a novel in the modern sense of the word. I can understand
>|> the need for adaptation, however and hope the movie will fufill my
>|> expectations.
>|> Cyrus
>I just saw the movie Monday night and it was not as good as it was all hyped-up to be. It had some good special-effects but the story was so lame. Save your $7 and wait for the tape.
> - Seton
Yes, save your bucks, the movie was not worth the bucks I spent, and I
only spent $4.50. I was very disappointed with the movie......I am now
eager to read the book, so I know exactly what kind of a hatchet job ffc
did to it. However, even without reading the book, the movie stunk, it
was slow, no really cool effects, I mean a werewolf doing what he was to
that gal, no a real big special effect......an American Werewolf in
London had much better effects.
Oh, I hate to ask, but what in the bloody heck was Dracula doing turning
