home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!udel!princeton!crux!roger
- From: roger@crux.Princeton.EDU (Roger Lustig)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: quite unique
- Message-ID: <1992Nov21.053013.16266@Princeton.EDU>
- Date: 21 Nov 92 05:30:13 GMT
- References: <1992Nov17.181046.21137@nas.nasa.gov> <1992Nov18.192304.15503@nas.nasa.gov> <11636@scott.ed.ac.uk>
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Reply-To: roger@astro.princeton.edu (Roger Lustig)
- Organization: Princeton University
- Lines: 42
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Nntp-Posting-Host: crux.princeton.edu
-
- In article <11636@scott.ed.ac.uk> iad@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Ivan A Derzhanski) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov18.192304.15503@nas.nasa.gov> asimov@wk223.nas.nasa.gov (Daniel A. Asimov) writes:
- >>Come to think of it, consider the following two uniquenesses:
-
- >>a) 2 is the unique integer that is an even prime number.
-
- >>b) 1/3 is the unique real number x satisfying the equation 3x = 1.
-
- >>Since there are infinitely more real numbers than integers,
- >>perhaps it *does* make sense to say that 1/3 is "more unique"
- >>than the number 2, in the above contexts.
-
- >Not really. We agree that "unique" means `only one [of a kind]', but
- >why should something be called more or less unique just because it was
- >selected from a larger or smaller set?
-
- Because we don't generally speak of things as being unique if they
- come from a small set, and because we usually *do* use unique to
- indicate the ultimate in rarity. "Unique" is usually used -- though
- not in mathematics, I'll grant you -- in ways closely related to
- scales of rarity.
-
- >a) 2 is the only integer that is an even prime number.
- >b) 1/3 is the only real number x satisfying the equation 3x = 1.
-
- >Is 1/3 onlier than 2, or what? :-) (If "more unique" makes sense,
- >then so does "onlier", since the two mean the same thing.)
-
- They don't mean the same thing. Or rather, "unique" may be used
- in the sense of "only" that you're using, but most uses of "unique"
- aren't like that. "Unique" is generally used for emphasis, to draw
- attention to some other quality--as in these two sentences, which
- have explanatory clauses to say *how* it's unique. We don't say
- "my unique son" anymore (though one did say that in the 17th C).
-
- Sure, their meanings are very similar, but they have different cachets,
- different webs of association. Not to mention different frequencies of
- use--"only" is one of the most-used words in the language, whereas
- "unique" is not, and, as I have argued elsewhere, is almost entirely
- avoidable if one feels like it. Try doing without "only."
-
- Roger
-