home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!princeton!crux!mikulska
- From: mikulska@crux.Princeton.EDU (Margaret Mikulska)
- Subject: Re: quite unique research?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.234600.27272@Princeton.EDU>
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: crux.princeton.edu
- Reply-To: mikulska@astro.princeton.edu (Margaret Mikulska)
- Organization: Princeton University
- References: <1992Nov18.042016.15898@news.columbia.edu> <1992Nov18.164506.24509@Princeton.EDU> <1992Nov19.034224.17561@news.columbia.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 23:46:00 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1992Nov19.034224.17561@news.columbia.edu> gmw1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Gabe M Wiener) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov18.164506.24509@Princeton.EDU> roger@astro.princeton.edu (Roger Lustig) writes:
- >>
- [That's Gabe, I think; I'm losing track of attributions, sorry. -MM]
- >>
- >>>Wow! Can I have that in writing?
- >>
- >>You just did.
- >
- >Legally speaking, email doesn't count as "in writing." Fax me.
-
- Would a fax be legally binding? I recall a looong discussion on
- soc.culture.jewish about whether a get sent by fax counts or not.
- Law is still behind technology, y'know. :-)
-
- -Margaret
-
-