home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!princeton!crux!roger
- From: roger@crux.Princeton.EDU (Roger Lustig)
- Subject: Re: Unique hypothesis--comments welcome!
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.223233.20493@Princeton.EDU>
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: crux.princeton.edu
- Reply-To: roger@astro.princeton.edu (Roger Lustig)
- Organization: Princeton University
- References: <1992Nov17.224011.20690@Princeton.EDU> <1992Nov19.012752.47158@evolving.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 22:32:33 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <1992Nov19.012752.47158@evolving.com> jww@evolving.com (John W. Woolley) writes:
-
- >Notice here, by the way, another good useful word, "literally", that's
- >used now as a kind of general intensifier. "Literally unique" seems to
- >mean (to most hearers) "real good". Ugh. These examples argue most
- >strongly for keeping hyperbolic and non-literal meanings secondary and
- >little-used for as long as possible. It's too late to save "fabulous",
- >"terrible", "discriminate", and "lousy". Let's try to preserve "unique",
- >"literally", "convince", "home", and all the other endangered words and
- >senses that make (or made) English such a fine, flexible, precise tongue.
-
- It's too late for "literally," same as for "unique." I refer you to
- the first line of "The Dead" by James Joyce, one of the great stories in
- our language.
-
- Let's face it: words with strong meanings will be used hyperbolically.
- It's as ingrained a language habit as we have; to your list of "too late"
- words you might want to add "Awful" and "awesome" and "horrible" and
- "Dreadful" and so on as well.
-
- Roger
-
-