home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!spool.mu.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!umn.edu!charlie
- From: charlie@umnstat.stat.umn.edu (Charles Geyer)
- Subject: Re: Unique hypothesis--comments welcome!
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.231257.5217@news2.cis.umn.edu>
- Sender: news@news2.cis.umn.edu (Usenet News Administration)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: isles.stat.umn.edu
- Organization: School of Statistics, University of Minnesota
- References: <1992Nov17.224011.20690@Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 23:12:57 GMT
- Lines: 35
-
- In article <1992Nov17.224011.20690@Princeton.EDU> roger@crux.Princeton.EDU
- (Roger Lustig) writes:
-
- > My last bit of evidence is the quotation from Todd (1818), cited
- > (epigrammatically, one suspects) at the beginning of the entry
- > for "unique".
- >
- > "an affected and useless term of modern times."
- >
- > Todd may be right. Aside from the use as "only" ("two is the
- > unique even prime number"), "unique" isn't very important, at
- > least, not to me. (I'd like to hear from people who use the word
- > a lot and find it indispensable.)
-
- O. K. You've convinced me. I'll never use it again except as a
- technical term meaning "one of a kind, there are no others". For
- example
-
- If a strictly convex function achieves its maximum, the maximizer
- is unique.
-
- An irreducible Markov chain has a unique stationary distribution.
-
- We refer to genes present in a single living individual as "unique
- copy" genes.
-
- I can't remember the last time I said "a really, truly unique, once
- in a lifetime opportunity". I don't think it will be hard to give
- up this usage.
-
- --
- Charles Geyer
- School of Statistics
- University of Minnesota
- charlie@umnstat.stat.umn.edu
-