home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!wex
- From: wex@castle.ed.ac.uk (John Wexler)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: Unique hypothesis--comments welcome!
- Message-ID: <28342@castle.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 14:39:55 GMT
- References: <1992Nov17.224011.20690@Princeton.EDU>
- Sender: nntpusr@castle.ed.ac.uk
- Organization: Edinburgh University Computing Service
- Lines: 31
-
- I have little use for the word "unique". Nevertheless, I think I
- understand its meaning, and I might use it from time to time.
-
- If it meant "unparalleled in every respect, among all the things that
- exist or have ever existed in the whole universe" then I would never be
- able to apply it to anything. I therefore suggest that the word can
- reasonably be used to mean "unparalleled in certain important respects,
- in some domain of interest".
-
- If you accept that, then I can argue that if thing X is unparalleled in
- more respects than thing Y, then X is more unique than Y.
-
- Example: Fred is the only person known to me who has converted from the
- Orthodox Church to Judaism. Fred is unique. Jim is the only person
- known to me who has converted from Hinduism to Judaism. Jim is also the
- only person who lives on the Shiant Islands. Jim is more unique than Fred.
-
- On the other hand, if X is unmatched in a domain of a million members,
- and Y is unmatched in the same respects but in a domain of ten million,
- then Y is more unique than X.
-
- Example: Fred is the only person known to me who has converted from the
- Orthodox Church to Judaism. Fred is unique. Bert is the only person
- known to anybody reading this newsgroup who has converted from the
- Orthodox Chuch to Zoroastrianism. Bert is more unique than Fred.
-
- For all that, I would avoid saying "more unique"; not because it must be
- wrong, but because I would get funny looks and tedious arguments from
- other people.
-
- John Wexler
-