home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.usage.english:8595 alt.sex:36532
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!concert!duke!dsb
- From: dsb@duke.cs.duke.edu (D. Scott Bigham)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english,alt.sex
- Subject: Re: A gender neutral pronoun
- Message-ID: <722057498@ptero.cs.duke.edu>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 03:31:39 GMT
- References: <1992Nov11.200400.2865@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <BxL0I3.1z4@unix.amherst.edu> <1992Nov18.100410.1@cc.newcastle.edu.au>
- Followup-To: alt.usage.english,alt.sex
- Organization: n. Arrangement in an orderly or logical fashion. See "miracle".
- Lines: 31
-
- From the Holy Book of <1992Nov18.100410.1@cc.newcastle.edu.au>
- as spake by ccjal@cc.newcastle.edu.au (John A Lambert) :
- >To me this is proof positive that we already have [a gender-neutral
- >pronoun]: `they'.
-
- And it's an ex post facto usage of the word, with all the awkwardness
- that implies.
-
- >Even `grammarians' gave up long ago worrying about `you' being used for both
- >singular and plural.
-
- Wait, 'you' _is_ both a second-person singular pronoun and a
- second-person plural pronoun.
-
- > How come some people still get their knickers in a twist
- >over the everyday use by millions of others of the singular `they'.
-
- "Oh, someone will be coming by with the Harrison transcripts. Send them
- to Joe in room 405."
-
- Now, does the 'them' in that sentence refer to the transcripts or to the
- person bringing them?
-
- See the problem?
-
- -sbigham
- --
- Scott Bigham | The opinions expressed above are
- dsb@romeo.cs.duke.edu | fictitious. Any similarity to actual
- bigham@hercules.acpub.duke.edu | persons or opinions, living or dead, is
- (but not for long) | coincidental.
-