home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!jtauber
- From: jtauber@tartarus.uwa.edu.au (James Tauber)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: last,latest,latter
- Date: 18 Nov 1992 03:36:19 GMT
- Organization: The University of Western Australia
- Lines: 40
- Message-ID: <1ecdnjINN2l5@uniwa.uwa.edu.au>
- References: <1992Nov17.111738.21414@di.unipi.it>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: tartarus.uwa.edu.au
- X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
-
- Nico Tranquilli (ntranqu@caticsuf.cati.csufresno.edu) wrote:
- : Could anyone please tell me the differences between
- : LAST, LATEST(?), LATTER ?
-
-
- LAST is used as an adjective
- e.g. He was the last person to finish the race.
- It is used very similarly as a noun
- e.g. He came last in the race.
- As you are probably aware, LAST in this sense means `after all others,
- coming at the end'
-
- LATEST is the superlative form of late. i.e. *The most late
- but it is used far more often to mean The most recent.
- e.g. Have you seen the latest newsgroup.
- Notice that this means the newest newsgroup, the one most recently
- started whereas the LAST newsgroup would be taken by most people to be
- the newsgroup coming at the end (of a listing)
-
- LATTER is only used when you are comparing two things. As one would
- suspect then, it refers to the second of two things. The first is called
- the former.
- e.g. Today I met Mr Jones and Mr Smith. The latter is a bank
- manager while the former is a computer programmer.
- Note that LATTER is actually an adjective but we tend to drop the noun
- that it is qualifying. By `The latter is a bank manager' we mean `The
- latter [man] is a bank manager'. Notice that latter takes the definite
- article `THE' - always `the latter' and `the former'. Come to think of
- it, all three (LAST, LATEST, LATTER) take the definite article when
- adjectives. Can anyone out there find any exceptions?
-
- : It's an ignorant question, I know and I also know that the last time I
- : posted here I had no replies, so I wonder if this newgroup is "reserved"
- : for native english speakers only...)
-
- It's not an ignorant question. I know many native english speakers who
- mix them up. It makes me wonder how English inflexions came about given
- that most native speakers don't understand why they use them. I guess
- most historical linguists would consider me ignorant...
-
-