home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!princeton!crux!roger
- From: roger@crux.Princeton.EDU (Roger Lustig)
- Subject: Re: quite unique
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.210608.12043@Princeton.EDU>
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: crux.princeton.edu
- Reply-To: roger@astro.princeton.edu (Roger Lustig)
- Organization: Princeton University
- References: <1992Nov16.112957.23053@black.ox.ac.uk> <BxtI97.n4I@dcs.ed.ac.uk> <1992Nov16.192525.27740@bcrka451.bnr.ca>
- Distribution: alt
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 21:06:08 GMT
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <1992Nov16.192525.27740@bcrka451.bnr.ca> nadeau@bcarh1ab.bnr.ca (Rheal Nadeau) writes:
- >In article <BxtI97.n4I@dcs.ed.ac.uk> pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley) writes:
- >>I agree with Fowler that "very unique" and "most unique" aren't good
- >>usage, but I'd make a special case for "quite unique". It's something
- >>of an archaism, but you can use "quite" to emphasise adjectives which are
- >>not of degree:
-
- >>"The butler lay in the hallway. Checking his pulse, Lord Dalliwell
- >>found that he was quite dead."
-
- >I believe we should only use "quite" if we can use "not quite" in the
- >same place.
-
- Um, why?
-
- >We can, for example, say that someone is "not quite dead",
- >meaning "barely alive". This makes sense because dying is a process,
- >and one can well advanced in this process without yet being dead.
-
- >But what would "not quite unique" mean?
-
- "somewhat different from all other items, but not radically so." That's
- what I'd take the expression to mean.
-
- Roger
-
-