home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!charlie
- From: charlie@umnstat.stat.umn.edu (Charles Geyer)
- Subject: Re: quite unique
- Message-ID: <1992Nov15.194221.19793@news2.cis.umn.edu>
- Sender: news@news2.cis.umn.edu (Usenet News Administration)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: isles.stat.umn.edu
- Organization: School of Statistics, University of Minnesota
- References: <1992Nov15.001709.14852@Princeton.EDU> <1992Nov15.045736.14307@news.columbia.edu> <1992Nov15.180410.20206@Princeton.EDU>
- Distribution: alt
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 19:42:21 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <1992Nov15.180410.20206@Princeton.EDU> roger@astro.princeton.edu
- (Roger Lustig) writes (flaming Gabe Wiener):
-
- > I take it, then, that you've actually looked up "quite" and "unique"
- > in a dictionary or similar? Again, I refer you to Evans and Evans,
- > who address the issue directly.
- >
- > Now, having said that, what does "quite unique" have to do with the
- > "either/or" issue? As I said (and you chose to delete), "quite
- > unique" can mean: not only unique, but also unapproached. People
- > don't just use the word "unique" to mean "one-of-a-kind", simply
- > because such distinctions aren't made often. Teh *degree* of
- > difference is also of interest in many cases.
-
- Having once written dictionaries for a living, I don't believe them
- to be gospel, just the attempts of harmless drudges to get fairly
- accurate descriptions of what words mean.
-
- Does anyone really use "quite unique" (or "really unique", "truly unique",
- and so forth) except when trying to hype something? No doubt the pages of
- Vogue and House Beautiful are full of such usages.
-
- Pardon me if I don't want to sound like that.
-
- --
- Charles Geyer
- School of Statistics
- University of Minnesota
- charlie@umnstat.stat.umn.edu
-