home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.romance:14209 soc.singles:31063
- Newsgroups: alt.romance,soc.singles
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!rpi!nuge114.its.rpi.edu!petitc
- From: petitc@nuge114.its.rpi.edu (Christopher Jon Petit)
- Subject: Re: net.hugs?
- Message-ID: <8cx16zg@rpi.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: nuge114.its.rpi.edu
- Reply-To: petitc@rpi.edu
- Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
- References: <13NOV92.21925419.0026@lafibm.lafayette.edu> <31517@hydra.Helsinki.FI> <1992Nov17.192506.24522@netcom.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 23:48:48 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <1992Nov17.192506.24522@netcom.com>, aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
- |> In article <31517@hydra.Helsinki.FI> taina@cs.Helsinki.FI (Juha Taina) writes:
- |> >
- |> >I'd like to ask why people share *hugs* and *kisses* on the net. What
- |> >is the value of them? Would you also hug and kiss a stranger in real
- |> >life?
-
- I think people don't *HUG* each other nearly enough. We all NEED to be
- touched. That's what's wrong with the U.S. We're too selfish to touch other
- people and acknowledge that we DO need other people's attention and affection.
- So, we use the only 'acceptable' way to need someone---when you're in love.
-
- --
- *HUGS*, a @>---'--,----, and a :&) to whoever needs them.
- "Whoever said that life was fair never read the rules, and found out that
- there were none."
- "Mysteries are for detectives; confusion is what the rest of us get."
-
-
-
-