home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.games.sf2
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!lynx!triton.unm.edu!dphantom
- From: dphantom@triton.unm.edu (darlene an 92sep02 lawry)
- Subject: Re: Advanced Strategy vs Guile and Ken/Ryu
- Message-ID: <-7rqxkg@lynx.unm.edu>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 92 05:04:04 GMT
- Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
- References: <j3pqz4b@lynx.unm.edu> <By3z73.7D2@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <u895174.722472464@bruny>
- Lines: 26
-
- >Guilty as charged. So, why do we do it? Well, usually I'll go into the
- >arcade with another master and we'll challenge each other for as long
- >as we can afford it. Once the money supply gets low we're forced to
- >fight the computer, so to be fair and avoid boredom we take turns.
- >If someone challenges, then the same principal applies.
-
- Alas, if that were the only case of switching in this area! Naw, that
- doesn't annoy me too much...I understand that it's rather boring when
- you're low on $ to just sit back and watch your friend play. And if
- it's only swtiching w/ two people, I can usually adjust my play pretty
- easily...unfortunately, around here, they'll do it in groups of about
- 6 people between all 3 CE machines (sometimes less, depending on how
- many people they round up that night), and it's much more organized
- to monopolize the machines than anything else.
-
- But, I still find the switching between rounds very direspectful and
- more unfair than you indicate (for reasons I've posted earlier). If
- that is your true intention for switching, then why not switch
- between games, not rounds? If it's not as big of an advantage as you
- (I, sorry) say it is, then you'll still be able to keep playing, right?
- If you find that w/o switching, you lose a lot more, then, well, it's
- obviously unfair.
-
- ---Phantom
-
-
-