home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.feminism:4876 alt.folklore.urban:29361
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uchinews!quads!mec6
- From: mec6@quads.uchicago.edu (rini)
- Newsgroups: alt.feminism,alt.folklore.urban
- Subject: Re: Death Threats and Pornography (was: Re: MacKinnon Suffers Snuff Harassment)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov22.210818.955@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Date: 22 Nov 92 21:08:18 GMT
- References: <1992Nov21.063808.903@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Nov21.182026.14492@panix.com> <1992Nov21.222331.23196@netcom.com>
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: mec6@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
- Lines: 21
-
- payner@netcom.com (Rich Payne) writes:
- >gcf@panix.com (Gordon Fitch) writes:
-
- >> Given the passions aroused
- >>by the subject of sex-repression-and-pornography (can't have
- >>one without the other, so it's really one thing)
-
- >I see three things, do you mean you can't have ---
- >
- >sex without repression
- >repression without pornography
- >sex without pornography
- >
- >or the reverse? (you can't have which-one without which-other?)
-
- I see two things: sex repression and pornography.
-
- I think he means you can't have sex repression without pornography
- and vice versa.
-
- rini
-