home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / alt / feminism / 4834 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-21  |  1.2 KB  |  29 lines
  1. Newsgroups: alt.feminism
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!uuserv.cc.utah.edu!jay
  3. From: jay@uuserv.cc.utah.edu (Jay Deuel)
  4. Subject: Re: sex in the good ol' days
  5. Message-ID: <jay.5.722366787@uuserv.cc.utah.edu>
  6. Lines: 17
  7. Sender: news@fcom.cc.utah.edu
  8. Organization: The University of Utah
  9. References: <1992Nov15.182653.10521@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Nov16.172842.16463@netcom.com> <1992Nov16.202344.25055@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Nov21.041944.20013@netcom.com>
  10. Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 17:26:27 GMT
  11.  
  12. >
  13. >Not ABSURD enough to question? This "Minister's Wife" writes
  14. >a supposed 19th century piece using 20th-century language and phrases,
  15. >displays the type of man-hatred that only came into existence very
  16. >recently, and doesn't even *mention* "God", or "self-sacrifice,"
  17. >or "duty"!!!!!!! And you people think it's a 19th-century item!
  18.  
  19. First, when I read this I laughed and thought that sounds like it could of 
  20. been representative of the era.
  21.  
  22. Second, if I was concerned about the authenticity of the article I would 
  23. have done a little research rather than flame the messenger (who included a 
  24. reference to check).  Why didn't you?
  25.  
  26. P.S. Is it true: "man-hatred [that] came into existence very recently"?
  27.  
  28. --Jay
  29.