home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.feminism
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!uuserv.cc.utah.edu!jay
- From: jay@uuserv.cc.utah.edu (Jay Deuel)
- Subject: Re: Forced PC
- Message-ID: <jay.3.722310769@uuserv.cc.utah.edu>
- Lines: 18
- Sender: news@fcom.cc.utah.edu
- Organization: The University of Utah
- References: <92325.144148REA105@psuvm.psu.edu>
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 01:52:49 GMT
-
- >Now on to my topic. PC. Maybe this is the wrong net to place this, but I
- >see forced PC see and forced feminism in the same light. One should not
- >force one's ideas on other's. It is not right to force others to submit to
- >thine own method of thinking. It is not PC to make others do as you want
- >them to. It is in that light that I say PC pushers are not PC.
-
- This reminds me of the latter 60's when a cry went through out the
- land of,"Let me do my own thing." Yet those who didn't smoke a joint,
- participate in free love, wear long hair/mini skirts, burn draft cards/bras,
- listen to rock & roll, etc. were openly branded as sheep - following the
- older generation.
- Also I find it interesting in the 90's, with the AIDS battle, that
- those who preach abstinance (the only true save sex) are often told this is
- the wrong message. I personally think all choices should get equal time in
- presentations to the public. Then let each individual make the decision of
- what their "PC", or "own thing" is.
-
- --Jay
-