home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.feminism
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!overload.lbl.gov!s1.gov!lip
- From: lip@s1.gov (Loren I. Petrich)
- Subject: Re: sex in the good ol' days
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.230131.4283@s1.gov>
- Sender: usenet@s1.gov
- Nntp-Posting-Host: s1.gov
- Organization: LLNL
- References: <1992Nov16.172842.16463@netcom.com> <1992Nov16.202344.25055@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Nov16.214342.27711@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 23:01:31 GMT
- Lines: 38
-
- In article <1992Nov16.214342.27711@midway.uchicago.edu> mec6@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
-
- >Robert is, I think, correct in being wary of that single, rather
- >extreme source. (It's true -- I didn't think twice before cross-
- >posting.) Anyway, the more prudent social historian may be
- >interested in the following academic references:
-
- [Conclusion: a favorite method of birth control ca. 1900 was
- for the woman to refuse to have sex]
-
- > Advice books from the period said stuff like, "she should not
- > allow access unless she wants a child."
-
- Just like that document quoted, which certainly looks like how
- to do so explained in rather gory detail.
-
- I wonder if these researchers studied prostitution in any
- detail, because with sexually unwilling wives, men seeking sex would
- find a prostitute a natural person to go to. And given
-
- It was widely believed in the Anglo-American world at that
- time that only men had a strong sexuality, that women were naturally
- averse to sex, that they preferred to lie back and think of their
- homelands. Even a lot of early "First Wave" feminists apparently
- believed this.
-
- Of the current "Second Wave" of feminism, it is true that some
- sectors, such as the feminist anti-pornography movement, may seem
- almost Victorian about sex, but some other self-professed feminists
- are downright raunchy. Consider lesbian sexpert Susie Bright. Or
- performance artist Carolee Schneemann. It amused me to see in Elinor
- Gadon's _The Once and Future Goddess_ (about the "sacred female", and
- presumably feminist in intention) to see a picture of Carolee
- Schneemann in one of her works lying back, bare naked, fully exposed,
- with two snakes crawling over her. How this differs from a Playboy
- centerfold is a bit hard to see. Maybe the snakes are the crucial
- difference :-)
-
-