home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.feminism
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!newsflash.concordia.ca!garrot.DMI.USherb.CA!uxa.ecn.bgu.edu!news.ils.nwu.edu!lynch
- From: lynch@ils.nwu.edu (Richard Lynch)
- Subject: Re: Please explain this quote
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.003136.1182@ils.nwu.edu>
- Sender: usenet@ils.nwu.edu (Mr. usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: aristotle.ils.nwu.edu
- Organization: The Institute for the Learning Sciences
- References: <1992Nov10.015616.4142@netcom.com> <1992Nov13.221449.12257@ils.nwu.edu> <1992Nov16.000417.13647@netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 00:31:36 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1992Nov16.000417.13647@netcom.com> payner@netcom.com (Rich Payne) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov13.221449.12257@ils.nwu.edu> lynch@ils.nwu.edu (Richard Lynch) writes:
- >>In article <1992Nov10.015616.4142@netcom.com> payner@netcom.com (Rich Payne) writes:
- >[redundant attributes gone]
- >>>>>>>>>carol@ee.uts.edu.au (Carol Gibson) writes:
- >> [men required "forced sex" of wives more often than the reverse]
- >
- >Actually, Carol did not say "forced sex". She is partially quoted below.
-
- Actually, that's why I put it in quotes. I was looking for a short term that
- would imply one spouse accomodating the other, and used "forced sex". Simply
- do a global replace of "forced sex" with "one spouse accomodating the other" if
- the term offends you.
-
- [documentation that the words "forced sex" didn't appear in the original gone.]
-
-
- >>As I understand it, you contend that _equal sex drives_ would imply the same
- >>_frequency of "forced sex"_.
- >
- >This is wrong, I have not made -any- contentions about -forced- sex. After
- >all the text that has gone back and forth, you still misrepresent what
- >I have said.
- --
- "TANSTAAFL" Rich lynch@aristotle.ils.nwu.edu
-