NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27/NN_1992_27.iso/spool/alt/fan/danquay/6923

Internet Message Format | 1992-11-17 | 3.6 KB

Path: sparky!uunet!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!tghost!unkaphaed!popec
From: [e-mail] (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: The real Dan Quayle
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 02:44:26 GMT
References: <[e-mail]>
Organization: Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, Houston, TX
Lines: 58

[e-mail] (Perry M Jowsey) writes:

>
>  I recently posted a statement which called for some respect to the Vice Pres
> ident Dan Quayle, and it was met with a slew of negative comments.  What I as
> all those people who are quick to bash Quayle is to take a step back and look
> at the man with an unbiased attitude.  I reaffirm my belief that Quayle was
> victorious in his debate with Al Gore, and not only do I believe he won but I
> believe he did so convincingly.  Thus far, I have received only negative re-
> sponses, but I am sure the vast majority of the population will agree with me
> Quayle has embraced the conservative philosophy that will surface in the 1996
> Presidential election, and this coupled with his ability to overcome the nega
> tive press he endured in his four years as VP should put him in a commanding
> position in the 1996 campaign.  As for the current state of our country, I fe
> Bill Clinton should paraphrase what George Bush has said many times "God Bles
> America" to "God Help America" because with a man of his ilk, we will certain
> need it.


Danny Boy's Chiuahua dog yapping turned the 'debate' into a silly
meaningless screaming match.  And the next day the press had a field day
pointing out Dan's boners and sleazy misrepresentations.  That's a win?
Dan looked bad.  Argumentitive to no point and aggresive for the sake of
being aggresive.  Well, it didn't do any good did it?

M"Man of his ilk"  Are you casting aspersions on our Slick Willy?
Slick willy at his worst is 100 times better than Bush at his best.  Bush
was both a liar and incompetent.  If you did not notice this, you have no
hope, buddy.  4 years of lies, Iraqscam, Iranscam, and 4 years of major
deficits, and no plan to turn things around.  Just gridlock, blame
throwing and namecalling.  This is a man who in january 1992 offered up a
budget that increased our deficits to $3999 billion dollars, an increase
over the last deficit of $131 billion dollars.  A one year increase that
would have been the single largest increase in deficits for any country
in all of history.  $399 billion dollars in deficits.  (Official OMB
estimate by Richard Darman).  THe biggest deficit in all of human
civilization.  If Congress had let him have his way.
  Not much leadership there, was there.  What would George 'n' Dan done
with 4 more years?  This is what you wanted?  This is what you voted for!
No competence there at all is there?  So now what do you think that
Clinton could do that would be as bad as what Bush 'n' Dan wanted to do?
Time to wake up.

Dan in 1996?  BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!  He would last about three primaries.
Dan has high, high negatives.  Because he has said so, many, many DUMB
things.  And has done so little really grand and great.  In 1996 there
are a dozen republicans that will overshadow little Dan.  I hope he runs.
 We need the jokes, but he'll be crushed.  And he'll never be president.
Maybe he'll run, and lose, and run in 2000, and lose, and run.
  Think he may become a perrenial candidate?  A new Harrold Stasson?


Pope Charles.   Subgenius Pope Of Houston.  Bye bye Dan.  Bye Bye George

--
[e-mail] (William C. Barwell)
Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, Houston, TX, [phone]
1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis