home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:6838 alt.politics.elections:23912 talk.politics.misc:60373
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.elections,talk.politics.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!pmafire!mica.inel.gov!ux1!news.byu.edu!gatech!darwin.sura.net!utkux1.utk.edu!DEEPCORE.CE.UTK.EDU!PA146008
- From: PA146008@utkvm1.utk.edu (David Veal)
- Subject: Re: RFD: alt.loathing.bob-dole
- Message-ID: <PA146008.504.721934267@utkvm1.utk.edu>
- Lines: 33
- Sender: usenet@utkux1.utk.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: University of Tennessee Division of Continuing Education
- References: <6953@huxley.cs.nps.navy.mil> <1992Nov14.190351.9807@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <1992Nov16.053547.984@news.acns.nwu.edu> <1992Nov16.153143.22236@babbage.ece.uc.edu>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 17:17:47 GMT
-
- In article <1992Nov16.153143.22236@babbage.ece.uc.edu> rbd@flash.ece.uc.edu (Bobby Davis) writes:
-
- >Douglas Meier writes:
- >>(Bobby Davis) writes:
- >>>Yeah, I saw an interview with him on McNeil-Lehrer a couple of days after
- >>>the election and all he kept saying was "57% of the country voted against
- >>>Clinton, 57% of the country voted against Clinton, 57% of the country..."
- >>>(you get the idea). Doley wanna cracker? - a parrot who knows seven words
- >>>is pretty impressive! Somehow no one thought to mention to him that 62% of
- >>>the country voted against Bush.
- >>>
- >>I find it particularly sad that you people (no offense intended) think
- > --------------------------------
- >
- >Doesn't bother me, but then I am not in the NAACP either.
- >
- >>everyone was voting *against* one person in the pack. Could it be that people
- >>voted FOR candidates because they thought one was going to do the best job?
- >
- >Although I voted for Paul Tsongas in our state primary, I voted for Clinton,
- >not against Bush, on November 3. My point is that if Dole wants to use this
- >"reasoning," someone should point out to him what it means regarding Bush.
-
- The difference being that Bill Clinton will be in the White House
- come January, not George Bush. Bush's popular approval is unimportant at
- this point, while Clinton's matters.
-
- Not that either matter very much.
-
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- David Veal University of Tennessee Div. of Cont. Education
- Information Services Group
- PA146008@utkvm1.utk.edu (Mail to VEAL@utkvm1.utk.edu will bounce.)
-