home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!mega!thornley
- From: thornley@mega.cs.umn.edu (David H. Thornley)
- Subject: Re: [UPI] "FBI probes computer child porn at Cornell"
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.195721.6706@news2.cis.umn.edu>
- Sender: news@news2.cis.umn.edu (Usenet News Administration)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: mega.cs.umn.edu
- Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, CSci dept.
- References: <9211211820.AA14627@crocus.cit.cornell.edu> <1992Nov21.184453.4548@eff.org> <Nov.22.20.51.11.1992.20989@inferno.rutgers.edu>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 19:57:21 GMT
- Lines: 51
-
- In article <Nov.22.20.51.11.1992.20989@inferno.rutgers.edu> gaynor@inferno.rutgers.edu (Silver) writes:
- >UPI writes:
- >> The FBI is investigating whether a Cornell University sophomore has
- >> transmitted child pornography over computer bulletin boards, a report said
- >> Friday.
- >Washington DC! Listen up! Give the FBI more important things to do!
- >
- Child pornography is important not because it is pornography but because
- it is....
- >> material involving sexual exploitation of minors
- >I'll bet they're payed a hell of a lot more than Ronald McD would pay 'em.
- >
- Well, that's a callous attitude. Working for McDonald's is not known to
- cause serious psychological problems throughout life.
-
- >> Netnews
- >That's "Usenet" or "UseNet", not "Netnews".
- >
- Actually, it probably isn't Usenet, technically, it's probably a.b.p.e or
- some such alt group. Now that you've shown you don't quite understand it,
- do you expect UPI to have a clue? Actually, you should be hoping they
- get it wrong; if university or company administrators conclude that there
- is something called Netnews that distributes child porn, don't you want
- to be able to tell them that Usenet is actually something different and
- shouldn't get the axe?
-
- >> In 1988, graduate student Robert Morris Jr. was convicted and fined $10,000
- >> for launching a computer ``worm,'' which also destroys software but differs
- >> from a virus in that it is self-perpetuating.
- >THE PERSECUTION OF MORRIS WAS UNJUSTIFIED (and I _hate_ using all-caps for
- >emphasis). It was his graduate project in computer risks and security. Given
- >the worm's tenacity, the likelihood of its accidental release is high enough to
- >believe that its release _was_ accidental. Regardless, it did nothing more
- >than propagate itself. Many consider his worm a good thing.
- >
- Many considered his worm to be annoying and costly, since it brought
- numerous systems to their knees for a day or more. Would you be quite
- so understanding if a microbiology student's graduate project accidentally
- escaped and caused everybody in a medium-sized city to have the equivalent
- of a severe cold? Morris did write a vicious worm, and it did get out
- somehow, and caused the loss of thousands or millions of dollars of
- computer and human time. Exactly what should the reaction have been?
-
- >This country (USA) is pissing me off.
- >
- At least we have people who will check publicly available sources now and
- then for evidence of felonies, rather than ignoring the possibility. Do
- they do things differently in Finland?
-
- DHT
-
-