home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / talk / rape / 1774 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-07-25  |  1.2 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!uoft02.utoledo.edu!dcrosgr
  2. From: dcrosgr@uoft02.utoledo.edu
  3. Newsgroups: talk.rape
  4. Subject: Re: Question for Scott
  5. Message-ID: <1992Jul25.132330.8930@uoft02.utoledo.edu>
  6. Date: 25 Jul 92 13:23:29 EST
  7. References: <1992Jul23.122910.8875@uoft02.utoledo.edu> <SCG.92Jul24192917@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
  8. Organization: University of Toledo, Computer Services
  9. Lines: 21
  10.  
  11. In article <SCG.92Jul24192917@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>, scg@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Scott Goehring) writes:
  12. > 
  13. > dcrosgr@uoft02.utoledo.edu writes:
  14. > 
  15. >>I am glad that you agree with me that there are a plethora of reasons
  16. >>to not report a rape.
  17. > 
  18. > Unfortunately, there are.  What bothers me is that you don't seem to
  19. > consider this to be a problem.
  20.  
  21. No, it is a problem. When it comes to the homosexual issues and stuff like
  22. that, it is not relevant to me. My sink of dirty dishes is. Further, if I were
  23. raped by a male, rather than fight a losing battle to modify society, I would 
  24. spend far less time and energy to correct the situation myself.
  25.  
  26. And, I would be guaranteeing that no one would ever suffer from the same person
  27. again.
  28.  
  29. Legal? Not even. Practical? Ask God. My decisions? Bingo.
  30.  
  31. DC
  32.