home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!darkstar!steinly
- From: steinly@topaz.ucsc.edu (Steinn Sigurdsson)
- Newsgroups: talk.environment
- Subject: Re: Native People's leadership (!!)
- Message-ID: <STEINLY.92Jul28125208@topaz.ucsc.edu>
- Date: 28 Jul 92 19:52:08 GMT
- References: <1992Jul27.203754.5809@iscsvax.uni.edu> <STEINLY.92Jul27185132@topaz.ucsc.edu>
- <1992Jul28.183126.4370@vexcel.com>
- Organization: Lick Observatory/UCO
- Lines: 59
- NNTP-Posting-Host: topaz.ucsc.edu
- In-reply-to: dean@vexcel.com's message of Tue, 28 Jul 1992 18:31:26 GMT
-
- In article <1992Jul28.183126.4370@vexcel.com> dean@vexcel.com (dean alaska) writes:
-
- In article <STEINLY.92Jul27185132@topaz.ucsc.edu> steinly@topaz.ucsc.edu (Steinn Sigurdsson) writes:
- >
- > real. This brings me to another question: why, when speaking of how some native
- > people's found a close balance between themselves and nature, is it pointed out
- > that they had all these diseases and only lived to be 50 and had very hard
- > lives... ?? Really now, tell me, do we really think that our QUALITY of life
- > has become so beautiful that "it was worth it?" I see SO much psychological and
- > other damage BEACUSE of this lifestyle we've created. STRESS.....!! Sure, we
- > live to be 100 -- unable to walk, talk and in a old folks home. Great.
- >
- >Yes. It is great. Try the alternative someday.
- >Remember that humans tend to scale crisis on a relative
- >scale, as major problems are resolved, lesser problems appear
- >more important - stress is quite frankly a trivial problem when
- >compared to hunger, and worrying about it is a luxury only
- >afforded by the sated.
-
- From your perspective. There still is a small minority in western
- culture (and I think its growing) who are willing to accept a
- significant decrease in material standard of living to get out of
- the "rat-race" and all its stresses and pressures. While starvation
- will never be a trivial problem, I am not aware that it was significant
- in native American societies, and we still have some in our society.
-
- Dingo, I'm sure you followed this on sci.env - maybe you saw the
- Malthus quote on native American conditions that John posted - but
- I assure you that starvation was significant in native American
- culture, and that current US conditions are not of the same order,
- bad as they may be. The "counter-culture" movement can only work
- (IMHO of course) _because_ it is marginal to society, I'd assert
- that they're effectively parasitic on the industrial society they
- want to reject.
-
- The emphasis on success, wealth, achievement, etc. that exists in most
- western (and plenty of other) cultures is not true of all cultures.
- Out technology gives us a clear physical, but not moral,
- hegemony over other cultures.
-
- True but irrelevant. Morality at some level can be made as relative as
- you like, I still consider starvation unpleasant and think anyone
- naive enough to compare yuppie stress to lack of food must be
- astonishingly lacking in empathy. I'd almost wish they'd get to
- experience the privation they've lacked so they could get a little
- perspective on life.
-
- The decision on which culture is "better" is clearly relative, and most
- people will have a subjective opinion on this. I would leave a final
- determination of this to a distant historian.
-
- Sure, in the meantime starving people will do what they can to get
- food, and yuppies will continue to whine about the stress of making
- the payment on the BMW and the 45" TV...
-
- * Steinn Sigurdsson Lick Observatory *
- * steinly@helios.ucsc.edu "standard disclaimer" *
- * Some people think they're really clever *
- * Smash your head against the wall Specials, 1979 *
-