home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!markh
- From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark William Hopkins)
- Subject: Re: BUSH
- Message-ID: <1992Jul23.003747.20010@uwm.edu>
- Sender: news@uwm.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
- References: <1992Jul22.181221.5192@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <91634@bu.edu> <1992Jul22.232300.4966@news.columbia.edu>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 00:37:47 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <91634@bu.edu> jaeger@buphy.bu.edu (Gregg Jaeger) writes:
- >Ah, but Clinton _is_ worse. With Clinton in the White House the _world_
- >would go to hell, not just the country...
-
- In article <1992Jul22.232300.4966@news.columbia.edu> egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes:
- >Might I ask you to give some REASONS why the world would go to hell
- >with a Clinton administration?
-
- You see, when Clinton was governor, the nation went to hell under 2
- successive Republican administrations. Therefore it stands to reason what
- while Clinton is president (the next highest office up), the whole world (the
- next highest political entity up) will go to hell.
-
- It's a general rule: the political entity next highest up from the one Clinton
- is administering will go to hell during Clinton's term.
-