home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!mips!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!usenet
- From: HADCRJAM@admin.uh.edu (MILLER, JIMMY A.)
- Subject: re: Who is this reference?
- Message-ID: <1992Jul23.184809.28577@menudo.uh.edu>
- Sender: usenet@menudo.uh.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: uhad1.admin.uh.edu
- Organization: University of Houston Administrative Computing
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 18:48:09 GMT
- X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20
- Lines: 133
-
- In article <1992Jul22.211417.17188@menudo.uh.edu> HADCRJAM@admin.uh.edu (MILLER, JIMMY A.) writes:
- >In <14kenaINNb11@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> regard@sdd.hp.com writes:
-
- >>> Why? Why do you feel abortion is wrong, Jim? Take that paragraph you wrote
- >>> about two weeks ago, and insert a why after every sentence. Then try to answer
- >>> them. That would make more interesting reading.
- >>
- >> Hey ho! The crux of the matter. I'll leave out the religion, as you're not
- >>a believer (that *was* you wasn't it?). Let's keep it real simple for time.
- >>A fetus represents, at the very least, a potential human being. I feel said
- >>potential deserves a shot at life, be it accidental or not. Destroying that
- >>potential is wrong, unless to preserve an actual in reasonably proximate
- >>danger.
-
- >(how's that for a disclaimer! Yuk!)
-
- No need to get so specific--Let's just say it was a bad week in t.a. 8^)
-
- >[lots from Adreinne on the lost potential of eggs and sperm that goes
- >[away naturally.]
-
- Before I start, I found it somewhat amusing you chose to name some of
- the eggs in your example. Meanwhile, many of your compatriots get downright
- nasty when someone uses the world "child" or "baby" (God forbid a name) as
- opposed to fetus. Just an observation.
-
- [Someone more cynical than I might think you were trying to turn the emotional]
- [tables on me, but since I know not read anything more into your words than ]
- [what is there, that someone is not me. big 8^) ]
-
- >Yet, there are MILLIONS - ooops - BILLIONS of people on this planet. We
- >aren't hurting for magic.
-
- Come on Adreinne, we can always use a little more magic! 8^)
-
- >I don't see a single solitary reason to bind the real, thinking, breathing
- >woman, who is a miracle in her own right, based on my notion of potentiality.
-
- There's that word, "bind". Please don't use it. I'm not binding anyone.
- I know you're perfectly aware of this. I know you don't mean to imply (that
- word again) that I would do so. I know there are others who would--I guess
- you're talking to them, but its bloody distracting for me. I keep having to
- remind the rest of t.a where I stand.
-
- >That's why I oppose abortion restriction, and a part of why I don't think
- >abortion is 'bad'. Abortion is a response to a pregnancy. There are other
- >perfectly valid responses, but there isn't anything wasteful or sinful or
- > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- >any-thing-else-ful about abortion itself, any more than about contraception
- >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- >or abstinence. They are all the same thing.
- >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- >Adrienne Regard
-
- [emphasis added by Jim]
-
- Setting aside the more obvious differences (time, place, method), since IMO
- that would be nitpicking--let us drive straight to the idea of potential.
- There can be no debating the premise that most human reproductive potential
- is lost or never realized (zillions of sperm never even get to try, much less
- fertilize anything). It is a biological fact, and very few seem to mind.
-
- However, there IS a difference between the potential represented by the
- individual sperm/egg and the two together in fertilization. No sperm or egg,
- alone, can develop into much of anything. They sit and wait and go away.
-
- That could be regarded as a waste of bodily resources--from a technical
- standpoint it is, as the materials used to create these sperm and eggs could
- likely be used elsewhere in the body. (Not a lot perhaps, but anyway...)
- Nature has a tendency to go for overkill in reproduction.
-
- But then they get together. Suddenly they are not sperm and egg, separate
- and unique, but Something Else. They are not the same thing.
-
- We can equate the various forms of contraception with abortion only so far
- as that they prevent a baby/fetus/insert-your-favorite-term-here from being
- born. Before fertilization, there is no magical potential to worry about--
- it's pointless to shed a tear for the millions of sperm that don't make the
- journey (and a major reason why I find religious objection to contraceptives
- goofy).
-
- After, we are no longer discussing preventing something that happens pretty
- rarely (from the standpoint of the eggs and sperm) anyhow. Once implanted,
- its a pretty safe bet that, barring unseen complications or outside interfe-
- rence, said sperm/egg combo will emerge in about 9 months as a baby.
-
- Pardon the freshman biology, all of which I'm sure you already know, but
- it helps me clarify my point.
-
- Now we head from the realm of mostly fact to mostly opinion (though there is
- some opinion in the above, and some fact in what follows).
-
- 1. The sperm and egg, separately, do represent a certain potential, but this
- potential is much farther removed from the actual than the implanted z/e/f.
- Alone, nothing happens.
-
- 2. Abortion is wasteful of a far more likely potential, regardless of whether
- or not other, more removed, potentials are also "wasted".
-
- 3. No sperm/egg alone can be a person. Only the two together can. Only the
- z/e/f can make that development step.
-
- 4. I believe waste is always a bad thing. Some waste is unavoidable, some
- is not. Abortion is an avoidable waste, and I regard it as wrong because it
- represents a qualitative waste of potential far and above the quantitative
- loss of sperm and eggs.
-
- 5. Some may regard this as sinful. I tend to myself, but such an appelation
- only applies to those of the same religious viewpoint. Otherwise, no
- comment.
-
- Some may find in this a rationale for women to get pregnant as much as
- possible to reduce the waste of eggs and sperm. From a viewpoint of pure
- efficiency in a reproductive sense, maybe, but let's not get ridiculous.
-
- In short, contraception and abortion are NOT the same thing, although one may
- reasonably argue they have the same net affect. Of course, if net effect were
- all that concerned us, child abandonment and/or infanticide would not be reg-
- arded as such a heinous crime (by US culture).
-
- semper fi,
-
- Jammer Jim Miller
- Texas A&M University '89 and '91
- ********************************************************************************
- * Aggie in Cougarland -- I just work here. *
- * Speak for my employers? They don't even know I exist! *
- *"Become one with the Student Billing System. *BE* the Student Billing System."*
- * ********************************************* *
- * "Power finds its way to those who take a stand. Stand up, Ordinary Man." *
- * ---Rik Emmet, Gil Moore, Mark Levine: Triumph *
- ********************************************************************************
-