home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!utzoo!henry
- From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
- Subject: Re: Emergency Evac/Reentry Vehicle
- Message-ID: <Brt68q.n3M@zoo.toronto.edu>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 20:58:01 GMT
- References: <1992Jul22.093505.22310@newshost.anu.edu.au> <BrsxMF.GCx@zoo.toronto.edu> <1992Jul22.195944.7431@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <1992Jul22.195944.7431@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> jeb2q@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (James E. Bryant) writes:
- >Are there plans in the works or in development for an emergency evacuation
- >re-entry capable vehicle? Might it be like an escape pod, which could re-enter
- >the earths atmosphere or would it be like a lifeboat in that all it does is
- >get the occupants up and away from the space station?
-
- There is little point to just getting them away from the station; that can
- be done more conveniently by just making it possible to partition the
- station into several independently-habitable sections (which physically
- remain together). That's what NASA originally planned to do.
-
- Now, there is general consensus that a re-entry-capable lifeboat is needed.
- However, NASA's cost estimates for it are large and Congress has consistently
- balked at funding it.
-
- For a while, the Europeans were proposing a modified Hermes for the job,
- but with the near-demise of Hermes that's probably a dead idea.
-
- One idea that is being taken seriously right now is using a pair of Soyuzes.
- There are problems -- Soyuz isn't quite big enough and it isn't certified
- for years in space -- but people are looking into it.
- --
- There is nothing wrong with making | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
- mistakes, but... make *new* ones. -D.Sim| henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
-