home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!news.bbn.com!ulowell!cis.umassd.edu!ursa.cis.umassd.edu!martin
- From: martin@lyra.cis.umassd.edu (Gary Martin)
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: Re: An interesting limit problem.
- Message-ID: <MARTIN.92Jul29125203@lyra.cis.umassd.edu>
- Date: 29 Jul 92 17:52:03 GMT
- References: <Bs1xzu.DFp@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Jul28.191037.28756@gdr.bath.ac.uk>
- <1992Jul29.000223.27339@massey.ac.nz>
- <1992Jul29.115656.23253@gdr.bath.ac.uk>
- Sender: news@cis.umassd.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
- Lines: 49
- In-Reply-To: mapsj@gdr.bath.ac.uk's message of 29 Jul 92 11:56:56 GMT
-
- In article <1992Jul29.115656.23253@gdr.bath.ac.uk> mapsj@gdr.bath.ac.uk (Simon Juden) writes:
-
- ...I seem to have started an interesting discussion. I should make it
- absolutely clear that:
-
- My views are my own and do NOT represent those of the University of
- Bath School of Mathematical Sciences
-
- That said, I agree that it is more important to understand the meaning of
- the operations than carry them out like a trained monkey. The point is that
- when faced with a new concept, IMHO the best way to understand it is to
- work through some easy examples, and then test that understanding with some
- harder ones. If students get into the habit of thinking about things such
- as limits rather than running to the nearest machine and asking it to do
- the problem for them they may actually turn into mathematicians. But if all
- that is taught in undergraduate mathematics courses is what buttons to push
- then the people that emerge from those courses will not be mathematicians.
- I don't think this is such an antedeluvian view! The problem that started
- this thread off was a good example of a pretty argument that those who
- misuse computers would have missed out on.
-
- Smile! ;-)
-
- Simon the Slightly Toasted Analyst
-
- And have we even had a proof that the limit is 1 that didn't use a machine?
- There was one posting that made the substitution y=tan(sin x) (or something
- similar) and claimed that the result was the reciprocal of the original
- expression, but I don't think that claim was correct. It's been awhile,
- so if you've forgotten, the problem was to evaluate:
- sin(tan x) - tan(sin x)
- lim ----------------------------------
- x->0 Arcsin(Arctan x) - Arctan(Arcsin x)
-
- I think I know how my students would do this:
- 2 2
- sin sin
- --- x - --- x
- cos cos 0
- ----------------------- = --- = 0. (Though they might leave out the
- 2 2 2 2 0 equal signs, too. :( )
- Arc sin Arc sin
- ------- x - ------- x
- 2 2
- cos cos
-
- --
- Gary A. Martin, Assistant Professor of Mathematics, UMass Dartmouth
- Martin@cis.umassd.edu
-