home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!news.funet.fi!ajk.tele.fi!funic!nokia.fi!newshost!chalcraft
- From: chalcraft@uk.tele.nokia.fi (Adam Chalcraft)
- Subject: Re: Hailstone sequences
- In-Reply-To: cet1@cl.cam.ac.uk's message of 23 Jul 92 23:46:46 GMT
- Message-ID: <CHALCRAFT.92Jul24095243@zebedee.uk.tele.nokia.fi>
- Sender: usenet@noknic.nokia.fi (USENET at noknic)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: zebedee.uk.tele.nokia.fi
- Organization: cpd
- References: <2020@bigfoot.first.gmd.de> <1992Jul18.115039.25704@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>
- <1992Jul23.234646.7306@cl.cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 07:52:43 GMT
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <1992Jul23.234646.7306@cl.cam.ac.uk> cet1@cl.cam.ac.uk (C.E. Thompson) writes:
-
- > By the way, it is natural to extend the domain of the function being
- > iterated to include the negative integers (or equivalently, to use
- > 3x-1 instead of 3x+1 in the x odd case). As well as the cycle
- >
- > (1, 2, 4)
- >
- > one then also gets
- >
- > (-1, -2)
- > (-5, -14, -7, -20, -10)
- > (-17, -50, -25, -74, -37, -110, -55, -164, -82, -41, -122, -61,
- > -182, -91, -272, -136, -68, -34)
-
- The result that on the positive integers, the function
- f(x)=3x+1 or x/2
- seems to eventually send every positive integer to 1, whereas the function
- f(x)=3x-1 or x/2
- does not is rather strange. Clearly the first function is "larger" than the second.
- All that this shows, of course, is that the word "larger" has no useful meaning here,
- and so any proof that the first function always goes to 1 must use something a bit
- more subtle.
- --
- | Adam | #include <stddisclaimer.h> |
- | Chalcraft | You can tell how tall a story is by how many flaws it's got. |
-