home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!pop.stat.purdue.edu!hrubin
- From: hrubin@pop.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin)
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: Consistency of ZFC, or anything else useful
- Message-ID: <54709@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
- Date: 22 Jul 92 01:11:01 GMT
- References: <1992Jul21.132554.152734@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu>
- Sender: news@mentor.cc.purdue.edu
- Organization: Purdue University Statistics Department
- Lines: 32
-
- In article <1992Jul21.132554.152734@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> fc03@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (Frederick W. Chapman) writes:
- >In article <1992Jul20.173716.6310@galois.mit.edu>,
- >tycchow@riesz.mit.edu (Timothy Y. Chow) writes:
-
- |>Perhaps you might try to use the fact that in ZFC one can formulate a
- |>proof that any two Peano structures are isomorphic. In that case,
- |>consider nonstandard models of ZFC...
-
- >If I am not mistaken, there are no *KNOWN* models for ZFC, standard or
- >otherwise! The consistency of ZFC set theory is not known; if a model
- >for ZFC were to exist, then ZFC would be consistent.
-
- >I can't speak for anyone else, but I find the notion that the
- >consistency of ZFC has not yet been established to be the most
- >singularly disturbing mathematical news to ever reach my ears, given
- >that ZFC is intended to serve as a foundation for the rest of
- >mathematics.
-
- I suggest then that you take a good look at what Godel showed.
-
- He showed that any system of axioms adequate for Peano arithmetic
- which is consistent has propositions which can be neither proved
- nor disproved. One of these propositions is always the consistency.
-
- So you must accept this disturbing news; any remotely useful foundation
- will never have its consistency demonstrated. Only relative consistency
- can be shown.
- --
- Herman Rubin, Dept. of Statistics, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette IN47907-1399
- Phone: (317)494-6054
- hrubin@pop.stat.purdue.edu (Internet, bitnet)
- {purdue,pur-ee}!pop.stat!hrubin(UUCP)
-