home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!destroyer!gumby!yale!news.wesleyan.edu!eagle.wesleyan.edu!mschmitt
- Newsgroups: misc.writing
- Subject: Re: Reserach in Fiction (the Star Wars tangent)
- Message-ID: <1992Jul21.130125.1@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
- From: mschmitt@eagle.wesleyan.edu
- Date: 21 Jul 92 13:01:25 EDT
- References: <1992Jul17.162953.2417@HQ.Ileaf.COM> <BrJrIH.5DF@unx.sas.com>
- <1992Jul20.175859.571@HQ.Ileaf.COM> <1992Jul21.141728.29806@bwdls61.bnr.ca>
- Organization: Wesleyan University
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eagle.wesleyan.edu
- Lines: 38
-
- In article <1992Jul21.141728.29806@bwdls61.bnr.ca>, pww@bnr.ca (Peter Whittaker) writes:
- > In article <1992Jul20.175859.571@HQ.Ileaf.COM> hal@HQ.Ileaf.COM (Hal Wadleigh) writes:
- >>One example of a "howler" is the use of parsecs as a unit of time in Star Wars.
- >
- > That's fine: all units of distance are acceptable as units of time as
- > well. It is perfectly legitimate for me to say "See you in 90
- > gigametres"; you might have difficulty figuring out that I mean "See
- > you in 5 minutes", but that is something we'd have to work out.
- >
- Only if you have a commone reference frame of speed. You have to know
- that the speaker is referring to the speed of light as the time basis. If I
- assume you mean .5c, for example, the whole thing falls apart.
- Also, relativity could reak havoc with your system. :)
-
- > How do 90 Gm and 5 min equate?
- >
- > speed of light (c) = 3x10e08 m/s
- >
- > 5 min * 60s/min = 300 s
- >
- > 300 s x c = 90 x 10e09 m = 90 Gm.
- >
- > The real howler in Star Wars was that they probably used "parsec" to
- > mean a fairly short time; a parsec is just over 3 years long.
-
- It's just over 3 years long _IF_ you're referring to the speed of
- light. However, if you recall, the Millenium Falcon travels in hyperspace,
- i.e. _faster than light_ (FTL). So, it could be much less.
- BTW, the official explanation (from George Lucas, if memory serves) was
- that this was an _intentional_ goof. In other words, it was meant to
- demonstrate that Han really didn't know what the heck he was talking about. If
- I recall, Obi-Wan had kind of an exasperated expression at the time, backing up
- this theory.
- But this is getting beyond this group, so....
-
- Matt Schmitt
- mschmitt@eagle.wesleyan.edu
- "Aspiring SF writer, dreamer, and idealist"
-