NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16/NN_1992_16.iso/spool/misc/activism/progress/5347

Text File | 1992-07-25 | 11.1 KB | 211 lines

Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
Path: sparky!uunet!darwin.sura.net!wupost!mont!pencil.cs.missouri.edu!rich
From: [e-mail] (Rich Winkel)
Subject: Children Pay for the Panama Deception
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Followup-To: alt.activism.d
Originator: [e-mail]
Sender: [e-mail]
Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu
Organization: PACH
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 23:15:29 GMT
Approved: [e-mail]
Lines: 196

/** reg.panama: 43.0 **/
** Topic: Children Pay for the Panama Decepti **
** Written  6:30 am  Jul 23, 1992 by hrcoord in cdp:reg.panama **
From: Human Rights Coordinator <hrcoord>
Subject: Children Pay for the Panama Deception

This article is excerpted from The Monthly Planet, a publication
of the Nuclear Weapons Freeze of Santa Cruz County. (Subscriptions
are available for $15; add $1.24 tax in Santa Cruz County; add
$1.09 tax for subs mailed to other CA addresses.)

Contact: John Govsky c/o The Monthly Planet
Address: P.O. Box 8463, Santa Cruz, CA 95061-8463
Voice 408-429-8755
Fax: [phone]
PeaceNet: freezecruz
Cruzio: scfreeze

Reprint permission is granted for non-profit use, provided that a
copy of the publication in which the article appears is sent to us
and that the following credit appears with the article:

(C) 1992 The Monthly Planet, P.O. Box 8463, Santa Cruz, CA  95061.
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
July 1992 issue -- The Monthly Planet
Article length: 1526 words
------------------------------------------------------------------

Children Pay for the Panama Deception

By Lois Muhly


        On June 11, while on his way to grace the world environmental
conference in Rio de Janeiro with his presence, our kinder,
gentler environmental president, George Bush, chose to stop off in
Panama to again reach into his bag of political tricks. His
mission this time, as once before, was to bolster his sagging
image as a political leader in the US and the world. And why not?
Two and one-half years ago his Operation Just Cause -- the invasion
of Panama, with the aid of a cheerleading US news media, had
served to accomplish this end. His plan was to tell his staged
Panamanian audience that democracy in Panama had been reborn under
the US-installed president, Guillermo Endara. Unfortunately for
our president, no one told him that Endara's approval rating was a
meager 8 percent, perhaps most of whom were in his flag-waving
audience.
        The world now knows that Bush's four ``just causes'' for the
invasion, i.e., to ``restore'' democracy; to defend the Panama
Canal; to save American and Panamanian lives, and to apprehend
Manuel Noriega, were part of a great deception for which hundreds
(perhaps up to 3,000) of innocent Panamanian men, women and
children paid with their lives.
        The true objectives of the invasion were twofold: 1) to wipe
out all vestiges of the Panamanian fervor for national sovereignty
which had become a major obstacle to the Bush administration's
intentions to continue its military presence in the Canal Zone
beyond the year 2000, (the limit imposed by the Carter-Torrijos
Treaty), and 2) to groom President Bush for a second run for the
presidency.
        The destruction of the Panamanian army and its demonized
leader, the nefarious Manuel Noriega (who had proselytized the
people's fervor for national sovereignty) served both objectives.
One cannot forget the headlines in our mainstream press shortly
after the invasion: ``Bush Hits Political Jackpot with Invasion of
Panama'' and ``Bush Hits Home Run with Invasion -- Lays Image of
`Wimp' to Rest.''
        On the morning of December 20, 1989, the military onslaught
by US forces was most intense in the neighborhood of El Chorrillo.
This neighborhood housed the Comandancia, the headquarters of
Noriega and the Panamanian Defense Forces, and the poorest, most
disenfranchised members of the city's population. Without warning
the sleeping inhabitants, bombs, rockets, rapid-fire machine gun
bullets, and cannon fire from helicopters fell upon the people of
this impoverished neighborhood. Remnants of the Panamanian army
were soon overwhelmed by the Goliath from the north.
        Those citizens who remained mobile after the first intense
strike were ordered to evacuate to the count of 30, being allowed
to take nothing with them. Over their shoulders they could see the
flames of their homes being burned to the ground as they fled. A
week of lawless pillaging and havoc followed the attack. Survivors
were relocated in 10-by-10-foot cubicles in hangars at Fort
Albrook, where most stayed for almost two years. All of these
experiences had tremendous impact upon the children of the target
areas.
        In August of 1991, my husband and I returned to Panama after
a three-year absence to film and otherwise record the aftermath of
the invasion. We observed many shifts from the attitude of hope
for sovereignty and liberty we had experienced on our visit in
1989, prior to the invasion. We found Panama to be a militarily
occupied country where there was great fear among those who were
the leaders in the quest for national sovereignty, even though
they were not necessarily in support of Noriega.
        In the course of our search for information about the
invasion and the post-invasion impacts on the people, we met
Antonella Ponce, one of the teachers displaced by the 40-percent
cuts to education after Guillermo Endara took over the government.
        Inspired by the United Nations Declaration protecting the
rights of children refugees of war, ratified in September of 1990,
she applied to the UN and received a grant to work with the
kindergarten children of El Chorrillo who had been traumatized by
the pre-Christmas attack. From January through April, 1991, she
befriended these children, played games with them, taught them how
to use the materials of art, taught them songs, talked with them
and, listened.
        During these four months of creative therapy she asked the
children to draw pictures of their experiences of the invasion and
to express their feelings which, at last, through her work, they
could bring to light, in words which were recorded by her on film.
        A book entitled Las Casas son para vivir, Que no vuelva la
guerra (Houses Are for Living, May War Not Return) was made of the
children's drawings and explanations, and was published by CELA,
an arm of the United Nations which works with children refugees of
war.
        Hector Collado, a Panamanian intellectual and refugee of the
Chorrillo conflagration, received the National Prize of
Literature, ``Ricardo Miro,'' in 1990, for the prologue to the book.
He wrote, ``Death rained suddenly and we are left without country,
without home. Our lives were estranged for an eternity and a
rancorous fire was instilled forever in the memories of 2,800
families.
        ``The children, the drawings, here reunited, testify to an
hour of anguish, sadness and uncertainty that does not stop
happening for the unfortunate members of the community of El
Chorrillo, the `Little Hiroshima,' as it was labelled by agencies
of the press.''
        The shock of the event left the children unable to speak
about it with anyone. Collado describes this aspect of the trauma:
``The child, soon after the event, resists believing it. He/She
hardens tenderness and says to us, with the drawings shown, there
is no repose. We must inherit the sequels of `the war of
December,' that which UNICEF has named `a lost generation, a
future of men and women whose childhood was assassinated.'
        ``The children know there was a war, a killing: that genocide
converted many of them into orphans; that the neighborhood was
scattered and the area reduced to dust and ashes.
        ``I don't wish to speak of death or wilted flowers, but I know
that in some place in the body of the history of the lives of
these children they have retained imprinted the ravages of the
conflict: the destruction of the victim house; the destroyed
balcony in the fragments of building materials; the porch, the
window suffocated by smoke and the dramatic vision of the neighbor
with child in arms devoured by flames.''
        Had President Bush read this prologue, he might have avoided
stopping in Panama, thus saving our country embarrassment
additional to that which he caused in Rio. In Bush's pride of
accomplishment at overcoming this minuscule nation and installing
his own puppet government, he demonstrates a profound ignorance of
the seeds of hatred that have been sown among the people of Panama
by his so deeply wounding this country and its people.
        The recovery of these children is hampered not only by the
sudden disaster of the invasion, but also by the immediate
eruption of looting and destruction of the downtown area. The
``have nots,'' recognizing the tie between the US government and the
Panamanian upper class which allowed this calamity to happen with
little resistance, expressed their anger upon the shopkeepers.
        Collado worries that this, too, will have its effect upon the
development of the children, saying, ``The following disorder, to
which the community was submitted, places itself squarely in the
path of the future of our children. For them it constitutes a
violent blow. -- And is it perhaps that there is no sadness when
the human race kills itself?''
        Describing the children's art, he says, ``...each picture is a
peephole into the darkness of the punishment of December; this
night poisoned by hatred, arrogance and superiority of the
greatest magnitude. Pictures of children, sons and daughters of
simple parents, rustic expression, as basically being the saying
and doing of children, reveal their preoccupation for the
permanence of the human species and their own affirmation in the
universe.''
        Two and one-half years after the US invasion ousted dictator
Manuel Noriega there continues to be widespread drug trafficking,
money laundering and corruption. The civilian police force, which
is slowly being supplemented by former army personnel is not yet
large enough to take care of the crime that now exists. Panama,
now heavily dependent on US aid, is under pressure to establish
economic and political stability by 2000, when it takes over
Panama Canal. Five thousand Panamanians still languish in jails
for crimes allegedly committed during and subsequent to the
invasion.
        While Bush callously tries to make political capital out of
the crime he committed in Panama, the innocent children of El
Chorrillo are left to confront each day the reality of fear,
poverty, crime and the psychological scars which are the legacy of
Bush's ``Just Cause.''


Lois Muhly is a board member and office manager for Children's
Creative Response to Conflict, and a teacher, retired from the
Soquel Elementary School District. She is a political activist for
children and education. Her interests and research have taken her
to Central America many times.


** End of text from cdp:reg.panama **