home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
- Path: sparky!uunet!spooky!witr
- From: witr@rwwa.COM (Robert Withrow)
- Subject: Controversy, objectivity, and common sense...
- Message-ID: <1992Jul28.145939.13774@rwwa.COM>
- Sender: news@rwwa.COM (News Administrator)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: spooky
- Reply-To: witr@rwwa.com
- Organization: R.W. Withrow Associates
- References: <fluet.711428210@ee.ualberta.ca> <1992Jul21.075346.26610@dellunix.dell.com> <+mfm04=@dixie.com> <1992Jul26.034856.9380@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <1992Jul27.203323.25102@crd.ge.com>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 14:59:39 GMT
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <1992Jul27.203323.25102@crd.ge.com>,
- davidsen@ariel.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen) writes:
-
- | I think that when/if that article comes out someone should post the
- | publisher's address on the net so we can all write a letter expressing
- | our views on John De Armond's objectivity.
-
- Perhaps, Bill, you will be so kind as to explain to us what qualifies
- your views as more ``objective'' than Mr. De Armond's are.
-
- If your views cannot be shown to be more ``objective'' than his, what
- justifies the claim of moral superiority I detect in the above
- comment?
-
- --
- ---
- Robert Withrow, R.W. Withrow Associates, Swampscott MA 01907 USA
- Tel: +1 617 598 4480, Fax: +1 617 598 4430, Net: witr@rwwa.COM
-