home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.unix.bsd:2866 misc.jobs.misc:5378
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,misc.jobs.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!socrates!ice
- From: ice@socrates.umd.edu (Fredrik Nyman)
- Subject: Re: AT&T sues BSDI
- Message-ID: <1992Jul25.222121.20426@socrates.umd.edu>
- Organization: University of Maryland University College
- References: <QUANSTRO.92Jul21140234@lars.StOlaf.edu> <1992Jul21.235727.4693@unislc.uucp> <FSTX.92Jul22102314@meryl.csd.uu.se> <1992Jul22.235604.27104@exlog.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 22:21:21 GMT
- Lines: 45
-
- mcdowell@exlog.com (Steve McDowell) writes:
-
- >In message <FSTX.92Jul22102314@meryl.csd.uu.se>fstx@meryl.csd.uu.se (Fredrik Stax{ng) writes:
- >> If AT&T wins, wouldn't that mean that in computers, you can't switch company
- >> without switching careers? This claim could be applied to any company that
- >> employs programmers that has worked for any other company before.
-
- > How about this, from one of last week's "Wall Street Journal"s. It
- > follows the same line of thinking that AT&T seems to be using in
- > this BSDI thing. It's pretty scarey for anyone doing sensitive, or
- > proprietary, work who's looking for like work elsewhere.
-
- > [Quote about IBM vs its ex-employee Peter Bonyhard deleted]
- > The article goes on to say that IBM is warning other employees that have left
- > to work for the competition.
-
- This raises another interesting question: layoffs.
-
- With the recession, fierce competition and all, a lot of companies
- including IBM, Digital, Prime and Wang have laid off large numbers of
- people, and killed many product lines and projects.
-
- If you're a software or hardware engineer and get laid off today,
- finding a new job will be difficult. Also, it's very likely that
- you've specialized in some narrow field such as parallel processing,
- office automation or whatever.
-
- If IBM wins this lawsuit, it may have tremendous affect on people who
- have gotten laid off since it would severely limit where a laid-off
- employee could work and what (s)he could work with since hir former
- employer could argue that the employee possessed proprietary
- information and hence mustn't be allowed to work with the same things
- for a competitor.
-
- Another interesting thing to ponder:
- One of NeXT's founders, Bud Tribble, recently left for NeXT's
- archrival Sun. As VP of software, Tribble must have had access to
- nearly all NeXT secrets. Now, Tribble left because the people working
- under him voted "no confidence" in him. If IBM wins this lawsuit, I
- suppose that NeXT could sue Tribble to keep him from working with
- software in general and user interfaces in particular even though
- Tribble had no choice but to leave.
-
- Comments?
-
-