home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cert!netnews.upenn.edu!uofs!prijat.cs.uofs.edu!bill
- From: bill@prijat.cs.uofs.edu (Bill Gunshannon)
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Subject: Re: Announcing 386BSD Release 0.1
- Message-ID: <10916@platypus.uofs.uofs.edu>
- Date: 21 Jul 92 17:27:16 GMT
- References: <14cuvtINN568@agate.berkeley.edu> <1992Jul20.135540.12384@uvm.edu>
- Sender: news@uofs.uofs.edu
- Reply-To: bill@platypus.uofs.edu
- Organization: University of Scranton, Scranton, PA
- Lines: 17
- Nntp-Posting-Host: prijat.cs.uofs.edu
-
- In article <1992Jul20.135540.12384@uvm.edu>, wollman@trantor.emba.uvm.edu (Garrett Wollman) writes:
- |>
- |> 3. As far as everybody who is not employed by AT&T and its
- |> licensees is concerned, BSD *is* UNIX, whether it actually contains
- |> AT&T code or not.
- |>
-
- I believe that AT&T has started a lawsuit against BSDI that is going to
- put an end to this idea real quick. If it don't say AT&T, it ain't UNIX.
-
- bill
-
- --
-
- Bill Gunshannon | If this statement wasn't here,
- bill@platypus.uofs.edu | This space would be left intentionally blank
- bill@tuatara.uofs.edu | #include <std.disclaimer.h>
-