home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!warwick!cudep
- From: cudep@warwick.ac.uk (Ian Dickinson)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.hardware
- Subject: Re: Networking recommendation
- Message-ID: <xvfnblph@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
- Date: 30 Jul 92 10:56:04 GMT
- References: <55590004@hpcc01.corp.hp.com> <1992Jul22.182937.643@zia.aoc.nrao.edu> <1992Jul23.130454.3965@ll.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Network news)
- Organization: Team Limpid's Meathead With Aptitude - Kunst und Wahnsinn
- Lines: 25
- Nntp-Posting-Host: limpid
-
- In article <1992Jul23.130454.3965@ll.mit.edu> mikem@ll.mit.edu writes:
- >In article <1992Jul22.182937.643@zia.aoc.nrao.edu> rmilner@zia.aoc.nrao.edu (Ruth Milner) writes:
- >>Join them with a piece of thinwire and terminators at each end. Might cost
- >>$25 or so (two terminators, two T-connectors, n feet of coax).
- >3/80s don't have internal transceivers, and there's no way to just take
- >the 15-pin ethernet ports of the 3/80s and wire them together. (Are there
- >any electronics wizards out there who'd like to say otherwise? Maybe it's
- >possible if you only have TWO workstations?)
-
- Is it possible using a direct connection between 2 10baseT tranceivers?
-
- >Clearly, Steve Aliamus wants to avoid spending the $60-$70 or so each for
- >a pair of ethernet transceivers, or else find a source for the cheapest
- >possible transceivers.
-
- Back to basics, it never actually said that ethernet was necessary
- (though I'd guess it's quite likely). How about a null modem cable
- and running compressed slip? Definately cheap, but short on bandwidth.
-
- Cheers,
- --
- \/ato - Ian Dickinson - NIC handle: ID17 Yo! Bum
- vato@csv.warwick.ac.uk ...!mcsun!uknet!warwick!vato rush
- /I=I/S=Dickinson/OU=CSV/O=Warwick/PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/ the
- @c=GB@o=University of Warwick@ou=Computing Services@cn=Ian Dickinson show
-