home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!yale.edu!yale!gumby!destroyer!wsu-cs!uts.cc.wayne.edu!cms.cc.wayne.edu!EIVERSO
- From: EIVERSO@cms.cc.wayne.edu
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hypercard
- Subject: Re: WAIT Command
- Message-ID: <1682DF168.EIVERSO@cms.cc.wayne.edu>
- Date: 23 Jul 92 21:09:57 GMT
- References: <BrutHG.1M3@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
- Sender: news@uts.cc.wayne.edu (News)
- Organization: Wayne State University, C&IT
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <BrutHG.1M3@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
- bhostetl@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Brian Hostetler) writes:
-
- >
- > Is there anything faster than 1 TICK when using WAIT? I tried
- >WAIT .5 TICK, but of course it wanted an integer.
-
- No, but if you just want to create a wait state, try executing a function
- or something. You, know: do some busy-work.
-
- You can roughly calculate the time spent by running this test:
- get the ticks,
- repeat the busy-work several times,
- get the ticks - it,
- divide it by the number of repeats
-
- --Eric
-