home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hypercard
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!lanl!davids
- From: davids@gardener.lanl.gov (David Simmons)
- Subject: Re: WAIT Command
- Message-ID: <1992Jul23.203801.26050@newshost.lanl.gov>
- Originator: davids@feynman.lanl.gov
- Sender: news@newshost.lanl.gov
- Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
- References: <BrutHG.1M3@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
- Distribution: comp.sys.mac.hypercard
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 20:38:01 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
-
- In article <BrutHG.1M3@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>, bhostetl@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Brian Hostetler) writes:
- |> Is there anything faster than 1 TICK when using WAIT? I tried
- |> WAIT .5 TICK, but of course it wanted an integer.
- |>
- |>
-
- You want to wait ~1/120th of a second? Remember that a tick is an
- internal clock cycle, not a second. Depending on what else is
- running, and what type of mac you're running on, a tick is ~1/60th
- of a second (your mileage may vary).
- --
-
- David G. Simmons "There's no problem so awful that you can't
- davids@lanl.gov add some guilt to it and make it even worse!"
- -Calvin
- If I said it, LANL didn't...
-
- --
-
- David G. Simmons "There's no problem so awful that you can't
- davids@lanl.gov add some guilt to it and make it even worse!"
- -Calvin
-